Legal Opinion
Comind, Companhia De Seguros v. Sikorsky Aircraft Division of United Technologies Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 14, 1987No. Civ. No. H-82-734 (TEC)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CLARIE, Senior District Judge.
The defendants, United Technologies Corporation (UTC) and United Technologies International, Inc. (UTI) move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court finds that the defendant UTC is entitled to partial summary judgment on the questions of agency, but that the defendants are not entitled to summary judgment on the other issues they have raised. The motion is therefore granted in part and denied in part.
Facts
The present controversy stems from the crash of a…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Boston Helicopter Charter, Inc. v. Agusta Aviation Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Public Service Co. of NH v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1988
- McKernan v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Alan Brown v. Louisiana-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Baptist Memorial Hospital v. Argo Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.