Legal Opinion
In Re Philmont Development Co.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 12, 1995No. 19-11785PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEPHEN RASLAVICH, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion of Chemical Bank For Relief From the Automatic Stay (the “Motion”) in each of the above jointly administered Debtors cases. An Answer in opposition to the Motion has been filed on behalf of the Debtors, Philmont Development Company, Philmont Meadows Ltd. Partnership # 1, Philmont Meadows Ltd. Partnership # 2 and Philmont Meadows Ltd. Partnership # 3 (“the Debtors”), and an evidentiary hearing was held on April 20, 1995. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
Background
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re Kkemko, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
- In Re Mayer Pollock Steel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
3Cited by17 opinions
- Centofante v. CBJ Development, Inc. (In Re CBJ Development, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Ad Hoc Group of Timber Noteholders v. Pacific Lumber Co. (In Re Scotia Pacific Co.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Pensignorkay, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- In Re SyedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- In Re Hassen Imports PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.