Legal Opinion
In Re Mayer Pollock Steel Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 23, 1994No. 19-11534PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Judge.
A INTRODUCTION
Before us is the issue of whether this court should confirm the Debtor’s [sic] Joint Amended Second Plan of Reorganization Pursuant to Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (“the Plan”) over the Objections of the Debtors’ largest secured creditor, Midlantic Bank, N.A., successor to Continental Bank (“the Bank”). These Objections are now confined to a few technical issues; a contention that the Bank is not being treated “fairly and equitably,” pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 1129(b)(1) and (b)(2)(A) because the Debtor proposes to allow it…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In the Matter of JAMES WILSON ASSOCIATES, Debtor. Appeals of METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Alphonso Jones, Debtor, Robert M. Wood, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- In Re 222 Liberty AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Matter of Landmark at Plaza Park, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
- In Re MorrisonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- CoreStates Bank, N.A. v. United Chemical Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- In Re Sacred Heart Hospital of NorristownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- In Re Kkemko, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
- Centofante v. CBJ Development, Inc. (In Re CBJ Development, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Union Meeting PartnersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.