Legal Opinion

Stoddard v. Hagadone Corp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2009No. 34335PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

This appeal arises from the Industrial Commission’s decision which did not assign responsibility to the Idaho Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (ISIF) for Claimant Robert Stoddard’s total and permanent disability benefits. The Industrial Commission found that ISIF was not liable for any portion of Stoddard’s injury. Royal Indemnity Company (Royal) appeals to this Court alleging that it was error for the Industrial Commission to find that Stoddard’s total and permanent disability was not a product of his pre-existing impairments combined with his last industrial accident and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ticor Title Co. v. StanionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Brand S Corp. v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hecla Mining Co. v. Star-Morning Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hindmarsh v. MockIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Idaho State Insurance Fund v. HunnicuttIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Berkshire Investments, LLC v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Oregon Mutual Insurance v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Hope v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Brown v. Home DepotIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Pocatello Hospital, LLC v. Quail Ridge Medical Investor, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API