Legal Opinion

State v. Benton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 25, 1990No. B63-787; CA A61763PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment finding him guilty of contempt and ordering him to serve three days in jail for failing to pay restitution in accordance with a previous court order. ORS 161.685. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the order to show cause why he should not be held in contempt. He asserts that the order “fails to set forth ultimate facts sufficient to constitute an offense, ORCP 21A(8), [because] ORS 161.685 violates” his rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and his privilege against self-incrimination under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Hathaway v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Langdon v. LangdonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. BentonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Leopold v. McCallisterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API