Legal Opinion

State v. Benton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 25, 1990No. B63-787; CA A61763PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.

pro tempore

Defendant petitions for review of our former opinion. 101 Or App 386, 790 P2d 1191 (1990). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), and adhere to our opinion.

On reconsideration, defendant asserts that we erred in holding that ORS 161.685 “as a whole” is a civil contempt statute, because ORS 161.685(4)1 provides for determinate sentences. The provision for determinate sentences, he argues, makes the statute one for criminal contempt.

We read ORS 161.685(4) differently. ORS 161.685(2) allows the court to imprison a contemnor only “until the fine or the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. BentonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Leopold v. McCallisterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API