Legal Opinion

Martin v. Vierra

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 1939No. Civ. 10541PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The plaintiff, Dolores Martin, about seventy years of age, while attempting to cross a public street in the business section of Santa Clara during the noon hour on a clear day, was knocked down and severely injured by a delivery automobile owned and driven by the defendant Joe Vierra; and she brought this action against him for damages. At the trial the cause was submitted to the determination of a jury on three issues of fact, namely, negligence of defendant, negligence of plaintiff, and the last clear chance; and a verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $2,500. From the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Pittam v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Vedder v. BireleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Hume v. Fresno Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Hobbs v. Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. McNear v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API