Legal Opinion

Skidmore Hall v. Rottman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1987No. 1582PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillin, P. J.

The issue presented in this case is whether a jury demand attached to a reply to a compulsory counterclaim applies to the original complaint when the counterclaim is dismissed prior to trial. We hold that it does.

Appellee Skidmore & Hall filed a complaint against appellants upon an alleged contract for legal services. Appellants filed an answer denying liability on the alleged contract and a counterclaim for attorney malpractice. No jury demand was contained in the complaint, answer, or counterclaim. Skidmore & Hall then filed a reply to the counterclaim, which contained a demand for a trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carl Sectional Home, Inc. v. Key Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Miller v. PoretskyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
  3. Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. GrayOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Ferguson v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Garman v. Metropolitan Life Ins.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Soler v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Soler v. Evans, St. Clair & KelseyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Coleman v. Excello-Textron Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Soler v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API