Legal Opinion

Soler v. Evans, St. Clair & Kelsey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2002No. 2000-2181PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 432.] SOLER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. EVANS, ST. CLAIR & KELSEY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Soler v. Evans, St. Clair & Kelsey,

2002-Ohio-1246.] Civil procedure—Frivolous conduct in civil actions—Pursuant to R.C. 2323.51, an aggrieved party has option of filing a sanctions motion anytime prior to commencement of trial or within twenty-one days of final judgment— R.C. 2323.51, construed—General jury demand included within a complaint applies to issues raised in a compulsory counterclaim even if complaint is later…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. May v. Tandy Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Denham v. City of New CarlisleOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sorrell v. ThevenirOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Denham v. New CarlisleOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Soler v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sigmon v. Southwest Gen. Health Ctr., 88276 (5-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Fehrenbach v. O'MalleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Edwards v. LopezOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Goddard v. GoddardOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Merino v. Salem Hunting ClubOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API