Legal Opinion

Dickerson Internationale, Inc. v. Klockner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 2000No. C.A. Case No. 99-CA-39 T.C. Case No. 97-464PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants J.W. Dickerson and Dickerson Internationale, Inc. appeal from a judgment rendered against them on their claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of warranty against defendants-appellees Richard W. Klockner and Klockner & Associates, arising from civil engineering and surveying services Klockner performed for Dickerson with respect to Dickerson’s development of a residential subdivision known as Pleasant View Estates. Dickerson argues that the trial court erred by finding that none of his land lies within the one-hundred-year flood plain, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bruni v. TatsumiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cohen v. Lamko, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gentile v. RistasOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
  3. Federal Insurance v. WebneDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  4. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. MDL Active Duration Fund, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
  5. Carey v. Down River Specialties, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API