Legal Opinion
First Heights Bank, FSB v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 17, 2000No. 96-811CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
In its January 19, 2000 order, the court addressed in part First Heights’ September 24, 1999 motion to compel production in this Winstar-related series of cases.1 In that order, the court rejected the Government’s relevance objections and directed production in camera of certain exhibits. See Coast-to-Coast Financial Corp. v. United States, 45 Fed.Cl. 796, 807 (2000). This order addresses some, but not all, of the remaining issues raised by the motion to compel.
BACKGROUND
The crisis in the savings and loan industry in the 1980’s prompted the federal government, acting…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Vaughn v. RosenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Blue Lake Forest Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.