United States v. Fontenot
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMKEWICZ, Senior Judge:
Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of rape, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. His sentence to a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for forty years was approved by the convening authority. Before this court, appellant assigns several errors.
I
First, appellant makes a combined attack on the military judge’s treatment of the question of his sanity. He asserts that error was committed, first, when his request for the assistance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Carzell Moore v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. MustafaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. FontenotUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. WhiteheadU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. HuertaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990