Legal Opinion

United States v. Fontenot

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided April 27, 1988No. ACMR 8701490PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMKEWICZ, Senior Judge:

Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of rape, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. His sentence to a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for forty years was approved by the convening authority. Before this court, appellant assigns several errors.

I

First, appellant makes a combined attack on the military judge’s treatment of the question of his sanity. He asserts that error was committed, first, when his request for the assistance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Carzell Moore v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. MustafaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. FontenotUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. WhiteheadU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. HuertaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API