Legal Opinion

Oddie v. Mendenhall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1901No. Nos. 12,591—(153)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action in the district court for St. Louis county against defendant, as receiver of Duluth Street Railway Company, to recover $16,000 damages for personal injuries. The case was tried before Ensign, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $2,500. From an order denying a motion for judgment in his favor notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, who was run upon and thrown from a carriage by one of defendant’s street cars. She recovered a verdict. Defendant moved for a new trial or judgment in the alternative, which was denied. From this *59order the cause is brought here for review upon the entire record.

Plaintiff resided at Duluth. Her brother, Harry George, who was visiting that city, invited her to take an evening drive. He procured a horse and carriage from a livery, and in company with his sister drove through the city towards West Duluth, until they reached the Asbury Methodist…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Minnesota Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  2. State v. DeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  3. Ericson v. Duluth & Iron Range R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Armstead v. LounsberrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Day v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Dong Chong v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API