Dong Chong v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.
Hawaii Supreme Court
Exceptions prom Circuit Court, First Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
FREAR, C.J.
This is an action for $123.15 damages caused to plaintiff’s mule, wagon and harness by a collision with one of defendant’s electric street cars. The district magistrate, who first tried the-case, ordered a nonsuit, and at the trial before a jury on appeal, the circuit judge also, at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence,, ordered a nonsuit, on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to-show negligence on the part of the defendant — the latter’s motion for such nonsuit having been made on that ground and the additional ground that the evidence showed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stafford v. Chippewa Valley Electric RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Flaherty v. HarrisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Benjamin v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Redford v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Laethem v. Fort Wayne & Belle Isle Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'sMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Young v. Honolulu Construction & Draying Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1938
- Ferrage v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1917
- Robinson v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1911
- Borowsky v. Honolulu Rapid Transit Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.