Legal Opinion

SEB, SA v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 9, 2006No. 99 Civ. 9284(SCR)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

ROBINSON, District Judge.

SEB, S.A. (“SEB” or “Plaintiff’) claims that Pentalpha Enterprises and Global-Tech Appliances 1 (“Defendants”) copied SEB’s deep fryer and sold it to Montgomery Ward. 2 After discovery was completed, Defendants brought this motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is denied.

During oral argument on the summary judgment motion, SEB asked this Court to order Defendants to turn over documents from one of Defendants’ attorneys. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants are ordered to turn over materials…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. EZ-EM INC.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  2. Wing Shing Products (BVI), Ltd. v. Simatelex Manufactory Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
  4. CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. Pty.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Fellowes, Inc. v. Michilin Prosperity Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API