Legal Opinion
Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. EZ-EM INC.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 20, 2009No. C.A. 09-228-JJFPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are the following motions filed by Defendants E-ZEM, Inc. and ACIST Medical Systems, Inc.: 1) Motion To Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6)(D.I. 7); and 2) Motion To Transfer Action Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)(D.I. 9). For the reasons discussed, the Motion to Transfer will be denied, and the Motion to Dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the Motion to Dismiss will be granted as to the indirect infringement claims, but denied as to the direct…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Altera Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Checkpoint Software Technologies Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Lattice Semiconductor Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- Monec Holding AG v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Graphics Properties Holdings Inc. v. Asus Computer International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.