Legal Opinion

Charpentier v. Young

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1978No. Docket 77-1099PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBashara, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a trial court order granting defendants’-appellees’ motion for an accelerated judgment. That motion was based upon the alleged failure of plaintiffs to commence their dramshop action1 against these defendants within the two-year statute of limitations.2

Injury was sustained by plaintiffs from a collision with an automobile driven by defendant Young, occurring on August 2, 1974. During a July 2, 1975, pretrial deposition, plaintiffs learned that Young had been drinking at the establishments of the defendants involved in this appeal.

On March 10, 1976, plaintiffs filed a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Gibbs v. TitelmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Forest v. ParmaleeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Gloster v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Process Equipment Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Cobb v. Mid-Continent Telephone Service Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Fazzalare v. Desa Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Moore v. FlowerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Amer v. Clarence a Durbin AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API