Legal Opinion

Forest v. Parmalee

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1975No. Docket 16910, 16911PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing

Allen, P. J.

We granted rehearing in this mat ter to consider the propriety of our earlier holding that the two-year statute of limitations was tolled for the period during which the trial court had plaintiffs motion to add the road commission as a party defendant under advisement. 53 Mich App 505, 509; 219 NW2d 806 (1974). A re-examination of the record and a reconsideration of the applicable principles have led us to conclude that our previous holding was wrong, and that the trial court properly granted accelerated judgment in favor of defendant. GCR 1963, 116.1(5).

At the outset,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. International Union United Automobile Workers v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wells v. the Detroit News, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Yarger v. City of HastingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Matson v. SoronenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Carol Anita Ringrose and Frederick Ringrose v. Engelberg Huller Co., Inc., Sundstrand Corporation and White Consolidated, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Home Insurance v. RosquinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Cobb v. Mid-Continent Telephone Service Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Barczak v. Rockwell International Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Barlett v. North Ottawa Community HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API