Legal Opinion
Gibbs v. Titelman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 8, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 72-2165PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BECHTLE, District Judge.
On November 2, 1972, the above-named plaintiffs, purporting to act as a class, filed a complaint seeking to have a Pennsylvania state statutory scheme involving the repossession of motor vehicles declared unconstitutional; 1 and to have defendant, General Motors Aeeeptance Corporation (“GMAC”), and all parties purported to be similarly situated, enjoined from continuing to effect extrajudicial noneonsensual repossessions of motor vehicles. The complaint also sought to have the defendant, William A. Titelman, Pennsylvania Director of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Clark v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Joyce Shirley v. State National Bank of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Barbara Fletcher, Etc. v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- In re Itel Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.