Albany Perforated Wrapping-Paper Co. v. John Hoberg Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CURIAM.
(Chis suit was brought by the Albany Perforated Wrapping-Paper Company to obtain an injunction against the John Hoberg Company forbidding infringement of alleged trade-mark rights. The bill asserts thirteen distinct causes of action, separately stated and numbered, each charging the fraudulent use of one of the following words or names alleged to have been adopted1 and used by the appellant as trade-marks upon its manufactures of toilet paper: “Sunflower,” “Beverwyck,” “Club,” “Clover Leaf,” “Pacific,” “Diamond,” “Hotel,” “Factory,” “Standard,” “Economy,” “Victor,” “Cabinet,” and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Caverly v. DeereCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1895
- Russell v. KernCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1895
- North Chicago St. Ry. Co. v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Albany Perforated Wrapping-Paper Co. v. John Hoberg Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Manitoba Fish Co. v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901