North Chicago St. Ry. Co. v. Burnham
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
In Error to tlie Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
This cause was heard at the October session, 1899. - The action was brought by the defendants in error, composing the firm of Burnham, Williams & Co., of Pennsylvania, to recover of the North Chicago Street-Railway Company the price of a steam tramway motor alleged to have been manufactured by the complainants for the defendants, and delivered on or about the 31st day of October, 1892. The original declaration contained a special count and common counts in assumpsit, on which issue was joined by the plea of non assumpsit. For a fuller statement, see the decisions of this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dushane v. BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Crouch v. . GutmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Benjamin v. HillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Keeler v. HerrIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ted Browne Music Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Bank of Havelock v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Pool Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Judge v. Pullman Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Albany Perforated Wrapping-Paper Co. v. John Hoberg Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.