Legal Opinion

Albany Perforated Wrapping-Paper Co. v. John Hoberg Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin

Decided May 18, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit to enjoin infringement of trade-marks.

1Opinion of the Court

JENKINS, Circuit Judge.

The complainant tiled its bill to enjoin the use by (he defendant of 13 different trade-marks of which the complainant claimed to he proprietor, and used upon toilet paper which it manufactured and sold. These brands were, respectively: Sunflower, adopted in 1891; Beverwyck, adopted in 1893; Club, adopted in 1891; Clover Leaf, adopted in 1891; Pacific, adopted in 189i; Diamond, adopted in 1891; Hotel, adopted in 1880; Factory, adopted in 1880; KLandard, adopted in 188(5; Economy, adopted in 1880; Victor, adopted in 1893; Cabinet, adopted in 1891; A No. 1, adoplod in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Candee, Swan & Co. v. Deere & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Layton Pure Food Co. v. Church & Dwight Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  2. Capewell Horse Nail Co. v. MooneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1909
  3. Loonen v. DeitschU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911
  4. Welsbach Light Co. v. AdamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1901
  5. Albany Perforated Wrapping-Paper Co. v. John Hoberg Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API