Legal Opinion
Harrell v. Bank of Wilson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 10, 1968No. 42403PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVTSON, Justice.
This is an appeal by Roy Harrell (defendant below) and J. W. Wilkinson from a judgment in favor of The Bank of Wilson (plaintiff below) sustaining garnishments against a portion of the proceeds derived from the sale of a homestead. The question presented is whether, under the facts and circumstances, such proceeds were exempt from the garnishments.
On June 16, 1965, the plaintiff Bank of Wilson filed two suits in the lower court against the defendant Harrell to recover the sums of $2163.75 and $805.65, with interest, representing the balances due the plaintiff on two notes and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Field v. GoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Japp v. Sapulpa State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- William E. Rutledge, Trustee of the Estate of Jackson Mortimer Nafe, a Bankrupt v. C. R. Johansen and Jane JohansenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Kelough v. NeffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Freeling v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Mannick v. WakelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Mannick v. WakelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Bowles v. GossCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- Matter of McMastersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.