Legal Opinion

Lachajczyk v. Schriber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: As a general rule, leave to amend pleadings should be freely granted; in this case, however, the proposed amendment is devoid of merit, and the court did not abuse its discretion by considering the merits (see, Andersen v University of Rochester, 91 AD2d 851, appeal dismissed 59 NY2d 968).

Plaintiff sought to amend his complaint to allege a violation of Labor Law § 240. Liability for a violation of this section cannot be imposed, however, where the contractor has no authority to supervise or control the plaintiff’s activities (Russin v…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Andersen v. University of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Magrath v. J. Migliore Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Reeves v. Red Wing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Sweet Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Wright v. Nichter Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Ellis v. WhippoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API