Lachajczyk v. Schriber
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: As a general rule, leave to amend pleadings should be freely granted; in this case, however, the proposed amendment is devoid of merit, and the court did not abuse its discretion by considering the merits (see, Andersen v University of Rochester, 91 AD2d 851, appeal dismissed 59 NY2d 968).
Plaintiff sought to amend his complaint to allege a violation of Labor Law § 240. Liability for a violation of this section cannot be imposed, however, where the contractor has no authority to supervise or control the plaintiff’s activities (Russin v…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Andersen v. University of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Magrath v. J. Migliore Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Reeves v. Red Wing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walsh v. Sweet Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Wright v. Nichter Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ellis v. WhippoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999