Legal Opinion
Reeves v. Red Wing Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 8, 1988PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiffs seek damages for injuries suffered when plaintiff Robert Reeves fell from a platform at the plant of defendant Red Wing. The complaint alleges that defendants Meister Contracting Company (Meister) and Raymond Burgun Trucking, Inc. (Burgun) were negligent and violated Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1) and § 241 (6). The cause of action against Red Wing alleges only a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1). Following joinder of issue, all three…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Fuller v. Mulcahy & GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Reinhart v. Long Island Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- Birbilis v. RappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Madigan v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Boncore v. Temple Beth ZionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Adams v. Cimato Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Gowans v. Otis Marshall Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.