Legal Opinion
STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY v. Tiger Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 28, 2012No. 40563-6-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
¶1 Tiger Oil Corporation (New Tiger) 1 challenges several superior court orders arising from (1) Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) 2 litigation and a consent decree entered after Washington’s Department of Ecology sued New Tiger for gasoline spills in Yakima during the late 1970s and early 1980s, and (2) New Tiger’s incomplete remediation efforts under the consent decree. At the outset we note that New Tiger entered into a settlement agreement and consent decree that resolved all claims and defenses between it and Ecology; therefore, we do not address New Tiger’s challenge to the 2004 summary…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Hillis v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Hillis v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tafoya v. Human Rights CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Fedway Marketplace West, LLC v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- David & Faris Tafoya v. The Washington State Human Rights CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- David & Faris Tafoya v. The Washington State Human Rights CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Ernest Emmert v. Robert GartenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.