Legal Opinion
Skiles v. Jack in the Box, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided September 14, 2005No. 05-04-00412-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By Justice LANG.
Wade Skiles, plaintiff below, appeals the trial court’s summary judgment that he take nothing in his lawsuit for negligence against Jack in the Box, Inc., defendant below.
Skiles argues three issues on appeal: (1) the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment finding that there was no evidence that Jack-in-the-Box breached “any” duty owed to Skiles; (2) the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment finding that there was no evidence that Jack-in-the-Box’s negligence was a proximate cause of Skiles’ injury; and (3) the trial court erred when it…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Willms v. Americas Tire Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Jack in the Box, Inc. v. SkilesTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Mazon Associates, Inc. v. Comerica Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Robert D. Coleman v. Reed W. Prospere, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Brookshire Grocery Company v. Goss, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.