Legal Opinion

Lauterbach v. Brown

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The only question on this appeal is whether the defendant breached the lease by his failure to dump the waste material along the marsh. In construing a contract the court should give effect to all parts of the instrument and an interpretation which gives a reasonable meaning to all provisions is to be preferred to one which leaves part of the language useless or inexplicable. A construction which renders meaningless a provision expressed in the contract or results in surplusage should be avoided if possible. Knuth v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. (1957), 275 Wis. 603, 83 N. W. (2d) 126; Bank of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of Cashton v. La Crosse County Scandinavian Town Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Knuth v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Herchelroth v. MaharWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. North Gate Corp. v. National Food Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Goldmann Trust v. GoldmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Nelson v. BoosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Columbia Propane, L.P. v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API