Young v. C.A.H.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey
I. Introduction
We granted certiorari to consider the limits of the probate court’s jurisdiction with regard to the guardianship of minors and its consideration of their best interests.1 J.C.T., a now ten-year-old boy, is at the heart of this conflict. Since before his first birthday, J.C.T. has been under the supervision of the Denver probate court. Based on a challenge by Respondent C.A.H. (“Guardian 1”), a former guardian of J.C.T., the court of appeals in In re J.C.T., 155 P.3d 452 (Colo.Ápp.2006), held that the probate court exceeded its subject matter jurisdiction during proceedings…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Swieckowski Ex Rel. Swieckowski v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- L.L. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Trans Shuttle, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Halsey v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- In re GustafsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- New Design Construction Co. v. Hamon Contractors, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re: The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Regina M. SPRINKLESupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- In Re Estate of MurphyColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. PerezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.