Legal Opinion

Halsey v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 9, 1984No. 82-1282; CA A28702PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

In this action for breach of an insurance agreement, plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment for defendant. We reverse. In May, 1978, defendant issued to plaintiffs a “Farmer’s and Rancher’s Multigard Policy.” In August, 1978, plaintiffs gave their tenant notice that his lease was terminated because of an alleged breach of the lease. In September, 1979, the tenant sued plaintiffs for $47,104 in damages plus $5,000 attorney fees for wrongful eviction, and on July 21, 1980, obtained a judgment against plaintiffs for $21,709, plus attorney fees and costs of $3,236.

Plaintiffs contacted their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Lusch v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Pulse v. Northwest Farm Bureau InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Tektronix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Prince George's County v. Local Government Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Young v. C.A.H.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  4. Carl v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Oregon Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API