Legal Opinion
Adams v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 5, 2000No. 96-93CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for overtime pay by approximately 350 United States Border Patrol agents, brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (1994) (hereafter, relevant provisions of Title 29 are referred to as “Section _”). After an earlier trial, we held that certain supervisory agents were not exempt from overtime pay. Adams v. United States, 44 Fed.Cl. 772 (1999). In other words, they were improperly denied additional pay. Other grades and positions within the Border Patrol were held to be exempt and not entitled to overtime pay. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Beebe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Charles M. Doyle and 4,428 Other Named v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Angelo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.