Dep't of Human Servs. v. N. J. V. (In re A. N. O.-V.)
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, P. J.
*648Mother and father separately appeal judgments establishing guardianships under ORS 419B.366 for their two children, A and J. Each parent raises both procedural and substantive challenges on appeal. We write only to address mother's first assignment of error, in which she contends that the juvenile court erred in denying her motion to continue the guardianship hearing to enable her to obtain and introduce the results of a mental health evaluation that she had recently completed.1 For the reasons that follow, we agree with mother that the juvenile court abused its discretion when it denied her…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. ConradCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark and DickersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Dept. of Human Serives v. T. H. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025