Legal Opinion

Magrann v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1961No. Appeal, 248PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Eagen,

The appellant is the owner of premises located in a D-Besidential zone in the City of Philadelphia. The zoning board of adjustment granted a use variance permitting the commercial use of the property as a gas station. The lower court reversed the board’s order. This appeal followed.

No additional testimony was heard by the court below, therefore, the sole question for determination, is whether or not thé zoning board abused its discretion or committed an error of law in granting the variance: Upper St. Clair Twp. Grange Zoning Case, 397 Pa. 67, 152 A. 2d 768 (1959).…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michener AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Pincus v. PowerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Ventresca v. ExleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Upper St. Clair Township Grange Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Cresko Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Fidler v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Andress v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. O'NEILL v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Di Santo v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API