Legal Opinion

Pincus v. Power

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1954No. Appeal, 240PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion i;v

Mr. Justice Bell,

Appellant-plaintiffs are the owners of six parcels of ground situate on the east side of Stenton Avenue at its intersection with the north side of Johnson Street in the City of Philadelphia. The lots have a total frontage of 185 feet and a depth of 100 feet. Plaintiffs sought and were refused a variance — hence this appeal.

Plaintiffs purchased this property on March 30, 1935, at which time it was and still is zoned “C” Residential. Under “C” Residential Zoning, the land can be used for detached or semi-detached dwellings or multiple dwellings. Plaintiffs sought a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Devereux Foundation, Inc., Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Rolling Green Golf Club CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Valicenti's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Kerr's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Lindquist AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Richman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Michener AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Medinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Volpe AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Moyerman v. GlanzbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API