Legal Opinion
Di Santo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 19, 1963No. Appeal, 48PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
This is an appeal from an order of the court below affirming the action of the Zoning Board of Adjustment of Lower Merion Township in refusing to grant a variance. No additional testimony was taken and the court decided the issue on the record developed before the board.
The facts are not in serious dispute.
Appellant is presently the owner of an unimproved piece of land located on the northwest corner of Coulter Avenue and Llanfair Road in Ardmore, Montgomery County. It has a frontage of 130 feet on Coulter Avenue, 167 feet on Llanfair Road and contains…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- GRATTON v. CONTESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Sheedy v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Schmalz v. Buckingham Township Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Rogalski v. Upper Chichester TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Crafton Borough AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- O'NEILL v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Zoning Hearing Board v. KonykCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.