Legal Opinion

Dantzler v. Defender Shipping Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 35611PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BODY, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are the plaintiff’s alternative motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial. Interrogatories to the jury in this case were answered by a jury finding that the defendants, owners and operations of the S.S. “Smith Defender”, were not negligent in any way. Negligence was the only theory of liability presented to the jury; thus, on November 21, 1967, we entered judgment in favor of the defendants.

On November 28, 1967, plaintiff’s counsel filed the post-trial motions here at issue. According to the mandatory dictates of Local…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Zon v. American President Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Keiler v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1966
  3. Tarter v. MylinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beron v. Kramer-Trenton CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Eulo v. Deval Aerodynamics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Green v. Sanitary Scale CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Cruz v. American Export Isbranbtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  5. Shaw v. LauritzenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API