Legal Opinion

Keiler v. United States

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided December 1, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 1438PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BROOKS, Chief Judge.

The facts of this case are stipulated1 and it is submitted on the merits. The record and the briefs of the parties have been considered and it is concluded that the expenditures made by the plaintiffs and their associates to obtain early possession of their leased premises are capital expenditures and are to be amortized over the useful life of the new building which they built to lease to Walgreen.

It is stipulated that the “sole purpose in acquiring the subleases was to demolish the old building and to erect a new one in its place.” The facts here, therefore,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Business Real Estate Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
  2. Cosmopolitan Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Houston Chronicle Publishing Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Montgomery Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  3. Third National Bank in Nashville v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  4. Dantzler v. Defender Shipping Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API