Ex parte Preyor
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Concurrence
Newell, J.,
filed a concurring opinion in which Hervey and Richardson, JJ., joined.
I join the Court’s order dismissing Applicant’s third subsequent writ. I write separately to note that Applicant' is not arguing that this is actually his first state-court writ because his initial state-court writ counsel did not file a proper “application.” See Ex parte Medina, 361 S.W.3d 633, 641 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). State habeas counsel filed á proper application that alleged specific facts supporting that application. At the evidentiary hearing, it was Applicant who instructed writ counsel not to present…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Davila v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Ex Parte GravesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Bosse v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.