Legal Opinion

Bosse v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 11, 2016No. 15-9173PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Per curiam

In Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496 , 107 S.Ct. 2529 , 96 L.Ed.2d 440 (1987), this Court held that "the Eighth Amendment prohibits a capital sentencing jury from considering victim impact evidence" that does not "relate directly to the circumstances of the crime." Id., at 501-502, 507, n. 10 , 107 S.Ct. 2529 . Four years later, in Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 , 111 S.Ct. 2597 , 115 L.Ed.2d 720 (1991), the Court granted certiorari to reconsider that ban on " 'victim impact' evidence relating to the personal characteristics of the victim and the emotional impact of the crimes on the victim's…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Hohn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Moore v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. Haywood v. HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. State v. Graham (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Michael Souryavong v. County of LackawannaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  5. Charles T. Johnson v. NPAS Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API