Legal Opinion
Park v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 9, 1986No. C5-86-931PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Michael Park appeals a declaratory judgment that he was not entitled to uninsured motorist benefits under his foster father’s insurance policy. The trial court ruled Park was not a relative, a requirement under the policy. We affirm.
FACTS
On August 4, 1983, appellant Michael Park suffered serious injuries when his motorcycle broadsided an uninsured pickup truck which had turned into Park’s path. Although Park carried no uninsured motorist coverage on his motorcycle, appellant’s foster father James Bujold had a Government Employees Insurance Company (GEI-CO) “Family…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Kaysen v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Rusthoven v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Merseth v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Mickelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ross v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Kabanuk Diversified Investments, Inc. v. Credit General Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- National Indemnity Co. of Minnesota v. NessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Marschall Ex Rel. Marschall v. Reinsurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.