Legal Opinion
Marschall Ex Rel. Marschall v. Reinsurance Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 7, 1989No. CX-89-1149PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Respondents Marschalls brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination of liability coverage notwithstanding the resident relative exclusion in an insurance policy issued by appellants Reinsurance Association of Minnesota and Kel-so Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance Company. We reverse the conclusion that coverage was available to respondents under the policy.
FACTS
Roy and Danita Marschall are the parents of Jason Marschall. On June 28,1985, Jason, then 10 years old, was helping his father’s farm employee, Daniel Hennen, repair a piece of machinery on Jason’s parents’…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- ICC Leasing Corp. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Merseth v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Park v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. HanksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. JohannessenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. JohannessenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994