Legal Opinion
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 20, 1991No. 3-89 CIV 326PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALSOP, Chief Judge.
This matter came before the court on February 1, 1991, on cross-motions for summary judgment by St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b).
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
The Supreme Court has held that summary judgment is to be used as a tool to isolate and dispose of claims or defenses which are either factually unsupported or which are based on undisputed facts. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323-324, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Hegg…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of the State Bank of Greenwald, Minnesota v. Douglas A. Winter Bernadine Winter Robert J. OsendorfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Finci v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Bartley v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. BowenColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.