Legal Opinion

Merwin v. D. H. Holmes Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1969No. 3539PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CHASEZ, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant James Merwin filed this suit on his own behalf and on behalf of his minor son James Merwin, Jr., for injuries to his son caused by drinking a product known as New Magic Jet-X Suds, a car wash product. This car wash product had been purchased by Merwin, Sr. from the defendant, D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd.

The defendant met plaintiff’s suit with an exception of no cause of action which was sustained by the trial judge. Plaintiff now brings this appeal from that judgment of the trial court.

As this matter is before us on the exception of no cause of action, we must…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hake v. Air Reduction Sales Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  2. Home Gas & Fuel Co. v. Mississippi Tank Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  3. Coignard v. F. W. Woolworth & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Hurley v. JC Penney CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. O'Rourke v. O'RourkeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hester and Nicholas M. Ross, Jr. v. John's Bargain Stores CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API