Legal Opinion
Mazur v. Ebay Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 5, 2009No. C 07-03967 MHPPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.
In this proposed class action, plaintiffs brought suit against eBay Inc. (“eBay”) and others (“Seller Defendants”), accusing the Seller Defendants of engaging in fake or “shill” bidding and eBay of acquiescing in the same. Now before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and for appointment of class representative and class counsel pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Having considered the parties’ arguments and for the reasons set forth below, the court enters the following memorandum and order.
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Robert Brown v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- In re Digital Music Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Wolph v. Acer America Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Arredondo v. Delano Farms Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Rushing v. Alon USA, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.