Wolph v. Acer America Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
Now before the Court is the motion for class certification filed by Plaintiffs Lora and Clay Wolph (“Plaintiffs”). The Court finds that this matter is appropriate for disposition without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-l(b). The Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion to strike the testimony of Dr. Alan Jay Smith and will consider Plaintiffs’ arguments as they bear on the weight of Dr. Smith’s testimony. (Doe. no. 115.)
Having considered the parties’ pleadings and papers and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Astiana v. Kashi Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2013
- Tait v. BSH Home Appliances Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.