Legal Opinion

Allison v. Kleinman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 28, 1992No. A8702-01288; CA A66368PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment dismissing claims in their amended complaint on the ground that the Statute of Limitations had expired. They contend that the court erred by dismissing those claims with prejudice, because they relate back to claims that were timely filed in their original complaint. We affirm.

In reviewing a motion to dismiss, we assume that the facts alleged and any facts that might be adduced as proof of them are true. Madani v. Kendall Ford, Inc., 312 Or 198, 201, 818 P2d 930 (1991); Machunze v. Chemeketa Community College, 106 Or App 707, 712, 810 P2d 406, rev den 312 Or 16…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Madani v. Kendall Ford, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. MacHunze v. Chemeketa Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Caplener v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mathews v. Federated Service InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Parks v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Allison v. KleinmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API