State v. Weller

The defendant has appealed from his conviction by the court of the crime of speeding, claiming that the court erred in concluding upon all the evidence that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.1

There was no finding and none was necessary. There is no dispute as to the facts which the court could have found: On April 1, 1966, at 5:15 p.m., the defendant was driving his 1965 Rambler northerly in Meriden on North Colony Road, where the posted speed limit was forty-five miles an hour. Another car passed him and then slowed down to about fifteen miles an hour to make a right turn, causing the…