Legal Opinion
Danzell v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 1962PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in a collision as the result of the negligence of the defendant. At the conclusion of the evidence, the defendant moved for a directed verdict. The court denied the motion, and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed from the judgment on the verdict, claiming that the court erred in the finding, in the charge to the jury, in denying a motion made by the defendant to set aside the verdict and in refusing to render judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Palmieri v. MacEroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Chasse v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Facey v. MerkleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Szela v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Crowder v. Zion Baptist Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Berchtold v. MaggiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Toomey v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Hanauer v. CosciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- State v. MesslerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Akers v. SingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.