Legal Opinion

State v. Fulco

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 5, 1940No. 35626PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

The relator, Frank Fulco, was charged in three indictments with violating section 1 of Act 16 of 1920, which reads as follows:

“It shall be unlawful for any Police Juror to draw money from his Parish Treasury, either directly or indirectly other.than his per diem and mileage except that the Parish Treasurer shall be authorized to pay the official expenses of any officer of the Police Jury or member of the Police Jury, who is acting under authority of the Police Jury.”

In each indictment it is charged that relator, while a police juror for Caddo Parish, drew money from the parish…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. State v. ArmitageSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  2. Wright v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Boone v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. DarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  5. State v. RoufaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API