State v. Zullo
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtPruyn, J.
On this appeal from the judgment of conviction of the charge of violation of the absolute speed limit provisions of the speeding statute, § 14-219 (a) (2), after a trial to the jury, the defendant has assigned as error two portions of the court’s charge to the jury. We test the sufficiency of the charge by the claims of proof of the parties as set forth in the finding.
The state offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved that the defendant was operating his automobile on April 3, 1966, in the left or passing lane for eastbound traffic of the Connecticut Turnpike, a four-lane…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Danzell v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- State v. GuerraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- State v. BindersConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
- State v. CalhounConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
- State v. BindersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MesslerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
- City of Des Moines v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974